What We Learned from the Work Shouldn’t Hurt Survey

During 1 of the worst school staffing shortages in Oregon history, a critical area is among educators who support the students with the highest needs. To better understand the risks of bodily harm and/or mental trauma these workers face and how to improve their workplace safety, OSEA conducted a survey of school employees working with special education and high needs students in the spring of 2022. More than 2,500 workers — representing more than 10% of OSEA’s represented workers — provided input. Below is a summary of their responses.

  • Reporting and training policies are in place…
    • 65% of respondents say their employer has a process for reporting dangerous student behavior.
    • Of those, 72% say they have been trained in how to report an incident, and 77% can complete the report on paid time.
    • 65% say their employer provides training for working with special needs students.
  • …but more is needed to be done.
    • While 76% of respondents had reported a student’s dangerous behavior in the past, more than half were somewhat or extremely dissatisfied with their employer’s response.
    • Only 1 in 4 say their training prepared them moderately or very well for their work.
    • 1 in 5 say they are regularly asked to work with student populations they have not been trained for.
  • Staff continue to work in dangerous conditions.
    • 76% report having been physically injured by a student.
    • 40% have been injured while assisting a student with high needs.
    • 1 in 3 are currently afraid of a student they work with.
    • Only 10% say they never experience violent or aggressive behavior from students.
  • Violent student behavior takes a toll on staff.
    • 20% of workers report experiencing panic attacks or extreme anxiety at least once a week, with 5% having symptoms every day.
    • Nearly half say trauma and mental stress caused by student behavior gets in the way of doing their job.
    • 2 in 3 workers may consider leaving their jobs due to stress.
  • When asked what advocacy priorities would have the most beneficial impact, workers favored:
    • Higher pay for staff working with challenging students
    • More training for staff working with special education and high needs student populations
    • Increasing staffing ratios
    • Finding more substitutes to cover when staff take leave